Can I mention competitors in a VC pitch?

A post inspired by a question on Quora: how to talk about competitors in a VC pitch?

  • There is no business that does not have competitors. If you say so, you just lost a lot of maturity and credibility points. Maybe there is no company that does the exact thing you do, but people have alternatives. (Before the advent of the car, people used horses to get around). Discuss them.
  • There is not much point in hiding the truth. Smart investors will find out in subsequent phases of the due diligence, and when they find a big competitor at this stage, you will have lost significant integrity points. 
  • Find a good visualization to show your distinctiveness. Put the competitors in some sort of 2x2, or a heat map that shows on what aspects you are similar and what aspects you are different. 
  • Sometimes competitive differentiation is not just about product features. Maybe your competitors are not focussed enough (they are part of a larger organization), maybe you move faster than your competitors ("look at their roll outs over the past year"), maybe you focus on a different geography.
In short be honest, but have a good story at the same time.

The cliff


I have seen many presentations likes this one:
  1. Stunning slide
  2. Stunning slide
  3. Boring slide
  4. Boring slide
  5. Boring slide
  6. Boring slide
  7. Etc.
A shame. It shows that the designers of these decks understand slide design. Why not push it through to the entire presentation?

A great image of the Mohr cliffs by Christmas w/a K

Good VC pitch presentations

A copy of a new section I wrote for my corporate web site.

In the very beginning, the only asset a startup has is often the VC pitch deck. Here are some suggestions for designing good VC pitch presentations. In the end I will list some of the resources you can tap in. There is a lot of information and advice available about startup pitches.

Different pitches for different meetings
There are different investor presentations in a fund raising process. There is the line up in a big conference where everyone has 1 minute to pitch (not very effective). There is the 10 minute phone call, the 20 minute coffee chat. The first meeting at the VC office, the presentation to the full partner group. Prepare your story and deck for each situation. As you go through the investment process funnel, your story will shift from talking about what the company is about, to how the company will do it.

Do a pitch without a deck
Practice a 20 minute pitch without slides in front of a friend. Record yourself, listen to your self. What sequence did you use to tell your story? What examples did you use? Where did you have the urge to take a piece of paper and sketch a framework? Where were you tempted to open your laptop to show a detailed chart with financials? All this gives you a clue about the sort of visuals you need to support your natural story.

It is about you
When an investor looks at entrepreneur, 50% of the attention will go to the content of the presentation, the other 50% will be spent on making a personal assessment of you, the presenter. Are you a good person to work with, who takes input from a Board? Do you have a sense of realism? Are you fired up for the roller coaster ride or hedging by keeping your day job? Can I trust you? Can you actually sell? Can you pull it off? These are all questions that cannot be answered by the slides you are presenting, they are answered by reading in between the lines.

Explain what you do
Very early on in the presentation, tell the investors what you are actually doing. Otherwise, they will be guessing and guessing in their minds what your talk is actually about. And people who guess do not pay attention to the content of the presentation. Do not be afraid to compare yourself to existing companies technologies in the market. This does not say that you are a me too, it just serves enables investors to put you in a box and understand in what market context you are operating.

Cut the buzz words
Buzz words, jargon. Experienced investors will see through it immediately. They get bored, and you lose maturity points. Talk like a person without verbal padding.

Sell the problem not the solution
Investors need to believe that there is a big potential market out there for your product. The best way to do that is make them feel what the pain in the market is. This is much more powerful than spending a lot of time on the solution.

Use interesting slides
Ditch the bullet points. Big fonts. Big images. The last thing you want is to bore the audience. Investor pitches can usually be bold and creative, especially for the first section where you sell the problem. Remember that it is not the number of slides that counts, it is the time it takes you to go through them.

Slick does not equal good
Having very sophisticated graphics and animations usually does not add to fundability of your business. Usually, sophisticated graphics do not add much to the story (if they are just background visuals that are repeated on every slide). Even worse, they could show poor judgement (spectacular animations do not come across well in a serious VC partner room). And even worse, it could give investors the impression that you are trying dress up the bride (a bit too much). Think about that car sales man with en expensive but poor taste suit and a heavy after shave. Do you trust him?

Be realistic about the competition
Any business has competition. Talk about them. Be realistic. And show how a seed startup can beat them to it. Acknowledge that it will be difficult, but that you have good odds. You will score a lot of realism points by doing this.

Address your weakness
Address the issue that is obvious with your company. Maybe it is a junior team, maybe it is a big competitor. Not that you need to blow it out of proportion and undermine your own story. The other extreme, not addressing the elephant in the room will not get you any investment either.

Do not skip the technology
An investor audience is usually intelligent. Skipping the technology is insulting them. Skipping it shows that you are unable to explain/sell your product to an intelligent audience. And finally, at this early stage of the company, the technology is probably the only distinctive feature that you have.

Transparent, simple estimates
Data provided by market research organizations saying that the market for x will be $1bn in 5 years does not really help you. Far better is a very simple and very transparent estimate of your market. A simple multiplication of 5-10 factors that you can scribble on a white board. The same is true for the company forecast. Everyone will put $50m as a revenue target for year 5 on a slide. You need to convince an investor that this number is optimistic (points for being a fired up entrepreneur), but not totally impossible. Again, this can best be done with a simple multiplication: what would you have to believe in order for this to be true.

No live demo in short meetings
Demos can go wrong because of stupid practical issues. Demos can take time (moving around menus, setting things up). These are all the wrong ingredients for a short pitch that builds up momentum to the final slide. Instead, use a pseudo-demo with a sequence of screen shots that shows investors what the product is about. Mention that you have a live demo and invite them to a separate meeting to play around with it.

Practice, practice, practice
Steve Jobs takes 3 full time days to rehearse his keynote speeches. You should practice as well. Strangely enough, it takes practice and rehearsal to be able to be spontaneous. Time your presentation and check that you can stay safely within the time slot you have been given.

Tap into the resources available on the web
Over the past years an enormous amount of information has become available about pitching to investors. Mark Suster is essential reading (posts about raising venture capital, posts about pitching VCs.) David Rose has recorded a classic TED video on investor pitches. Dave McClure has his own distinctive style of suggesting ways to improve your pitch. I have been posting extensively about investor pitches on the blog over past 3 years, see the investor pitch category here, or browse through a deck I prepared with presentation lessons for entrepreneurs. Quora is a new question and answer site with direct participation of some the world's most famous investors, see the investor pitch section here.

New web site!

Finally, I am happy with the design of my corporate web site. The previous one was still too cluttered, but now I have reached the appropriate level of minimalism.

PowerPoint 2011 for Mac review

I have been working for a few days with Microsoft Office for Mac 2011 now (affiliate link), having upgraded from the earlier version PowerPoint 2008. For me, the Mac is still a secondary machine, and testing this software is one of the key determinants whether I can move across all together to a Mac environment. All my clients use PC-based Microsoft Office software, so Keynote cannot replace office.


Initially I was a bit wary of Office 2011, having read some poor reviews on Amazon and by columnists such as David Pogue. Maybe it was because of this that I wrote this impulse post about stability issues of PowerPoint 2011.

I managed to solve the problem (after a lot of searching online). Somehow, PowerPoint 2011 can crash every time you enter slideshow mode after you have done some heavy toolbar customization. It happened to me a few times in a row. All fine, customize toolbars, crash, reset toolbars, all fine, customize toolbars, crash. At the moment I stopped the poker game (do I have the courage to add another toolbar customization or not, at the risk of having to reset all previous modifications?) at a level that I am happy with my current toolbars. So the issue remains.

For the rest, I must say that I actually like PowerPoint 2011. The differences with the PC version are minimal, someone with experience with PowerPoint on a PC can switch over instantly. The previous version (PowerPoint 2008) had a user interface that was different from the PC, and also lacked some functionality. Now there is a level playing field. (Well almost, for some reason you cannot change the spacing of the grid in PowerPoint 2011, making it hard to set a grid line exactly at 0 of your slide).

So in conclusion a great piece of software, but I am waiting for that one upgrade that will kill this toolbar customization issue.

I have not yet reviewed Word 2011 and Excel 2011 (the latter got the harshest verdict from David Pogue).

UPDATE 1: OK, there is one big difference with PowerPoint 2010 for Windows: boolean operations on shapes. On the PC version you no can join and subtract shapes. Not in the Mac version. See an earlier post where I praised shape subtract.

UPDATE 2: I think I managed to track down the source of this toolbar bug myself. Do not try to drag the straight arrow connector buttons into your customer toolbar, see a later post here.

Designing board presentations

Board presentations have a typical setting. The audience is usually relatively small and consists mainly of insiders in the company. Usually, Board papers get send around a few days before the actual meeting. Board members are experienced executives with busy schedules that want to make decisions and get to the point. They will not hesitate to urge you to move on when they think they got the message. (A big difference from a conference presentation where the audience can either walk out or check email on their mobile device if the presentation is not interesting).

The basis of the Board meeting material is usually a large slide deck full of facts and analysis. The most important recommendation is to put that aside as the basis for your presentation. Strategy documents are highly structured, highly organized, highly detailed, and exhaustive. As a result, they contain too much information, do not get to the point fast enough, and are frankly boring. This is great if you want to solve a problem, it is not effective if you want to communicate the solution.

Start off with thinking about what you want your Board to decide. Board meetings are all about decisions, not about fact sharing without a purpose. Set up the agenda, and put the decisions you want taken right upfront. The presentation challenge is now how to convince the Board that your suggested decisions are the right ones.

Every Board presentation usually has a few slides that form the stage for the group discussion. Anticipate what these slides should be and spend most of your effort on these ones. Key slides are usually those that map the possible options and shows the key trade-off that is required to chose the best one. Often, I use a heat map in these situations. A heat map is a simple table with the options as columns, and criteria on the rows. You can color the cells of the table with green, orange, or red to make the trade-off visible. Another way to show trade-offs is to plot your strategic options on some sort of 2x2 matrix, or show yourself on a 2x2 matrix now, and where you want to be in the future versus competitors.

So, the difficulty of these slides is not the design of a 2x2 or a heat map, it is picking the right criteria. Right means useful to make the right trade-off, and suitable for a live discussion in the Board. It is the latter that is the most difficult. Board members usually have strong perspectives and meetings can spin out of control if they are not managed well. Good slides are an essential part of this.

The secret is to simplify the degrees of freedom and the amount of uncertainties in the decision. There are a number of ways to do this. The most powerful one is quantification. Often it is possible to boil down different strategic options down to a single number the NPV or net present value of the future profit stream for example. This number combines assumptions about market size, market growth, market share, pricing, margins, risk, investments, (and their timing). You list the NPVs of the different options, and show sensitivities only to those variables that are controversial (risk, competitive behavior), while leaving some of the obvious ones out of the equation. What matters is not so much whether you come up with the exact NPV value, what matters is that your trade-off is right, this option is more attractive than the other one by a wide margin.

Another way to simplify beyond quantification is to group similar criteria together. Can we do it, do we have the right people, etc. all can be collapsed in one factor. The best outcome of this simplification process is to get stark trade-offs between options. That makes deciding between easier.

Once you have set up the basic argument, you can support your red, yellow, and green scores with charts. Skip the charts with obvious information that everyone knows already. Do not waste to much time re-formating highly detailed charts from the fact pack, it is an internal audience after all. Do spend time though on information that might be different from the usual. Analysis that you have done beyond the standard reports, consumer feedback from the latest round of market research, new market share data, etc. Often you know beforehand what the big controversial issues will be in the meeting. Anticipate those, and prepare charts with facts to address them.

During the meeting come back all the time to your central decision map. It might even be recommended to project your slides onto a white board so that people can stand up and scribble on your charts. It is powerful way to control the dynamics in the meeting, someone who holds the pen, speaks.

So in short, the challenge with Board meetings is not so much the slide design, it is anticipating the debate and managing the discussion.

Small scenes showing big opportunities

Most startups pitching for VC money would pound the audience with billion dollar market forecasts produced by market research firms such as IDC or Gartner. They are important, but they do not touch the gut feel of an investor. Often, showing a small street scene without a single number in it, does the trick.

As an example, take online gambling, and let's go to Spain. Anyone who spend some time there has seen the numerous lottery stands scattered across the cities. What if all these people could get the same thrill of purchasing a lottery ticket on their mobile device, rather than standing (visibly annoyed) in a long line? The opportunity is staring you in the face, right in front of you. The VC is reminded of it every time he drives to the office, every day of the week.


If you are interested, a recent blog post by Seth Godin about why these people are not buying the ticket to win the big prize. Image credit to Paul and Jill.

Images from the past

The majority of stock images are boring, why not look for real ones? The Internet offers now some interesting ways to get your hands on images from the past, great to transfer your audience to a point back in history. Here are a few of my favorite sources:

The images used here:

Creative commons images on Flickr, search by date

Vintage ads, watch out for copyright

Vintage magazine covers

Vintage websites (duarte.com ~2000)

Notice how you skip the introduction?

Have you noticed how, whenever you start reading an article with a promise in the headline "The 18 secrets to [x]", "Why is it that [y]", you usually skip the introduction and/or skim the text to find the answer the headline promised? Introductions usually repeat the headline and contain background information such as the bio of the speaker that we do not have time for. Not the interesting stuff the reader is looking for.


Your audience wants to do the same with your presentation, except, they cannot. Taking the clicker, fast forwarding and asking you to get to the point would be rude. Instead, they start checking email on their mobile device until it gets really interesting.

Detail of an image claimed by John McNab.

Slide idea - global expansion!

A startup has the master plan to spread out across the globe. A variant on the Universal globe



How to create this text effect in PowerPoint: select the text (in a narrow font if your text is long), go to format, text effect, "can down" (somewhere in the middle right). Go back to format, select glow, glow options and set a color (I picked black).

18 reasons why PowerPoint looks like PowerPoint

This question has been bugging me for years: why does PowerPoint look like PowerPoint and not like a well designed piece of graphics design work. The answer is obvious for poorly designed slides full of bullet points. But still, even when slides are designed by a professional designer (including me), they will not reach the professional and designer look of a good piece of print design.

I have not found the answer yet, but am getting closer (maybe). Especially after reading an enormous amount of books on graphics design and typography, and a renewed interest in graphics used in television productions (Fox is horrible, MTV is good). Here we go (written in random order):
  1. PowerPoint presentations use over-used fonts. Arial, Verdana, Calibri, it just does not look as good as Helvetica or other print classics
  2. Presentation design = filling Microsoft's default bullet template
  3. PowerPoint presentations are stuck in between text and display sizes. An average presentation sentence is so short that we can put it in bigger characters than a text-size, but still too long to put it in an enormous display font. Fonts are not designed for this twilight zone. (Helvetica is an example)
  4. Most good PowerPoint designers understand the concept of white space, and use it. However, we still tend to keep margins around the slide very small, making the whole composition look cramped.
  5. It is tedious to change the leading(the vertical distance between lines of text) in PowerPoint, so we end up using the standard proportion that was designed for small font sizes (and too large for display font sizes)
  6. Nobody really uses a consistent grid structure slide after slide
  7. PowerPoint designers hardly break up a text string to play around with a sentence's typography. Lower part of the sentence, color part of the sentence, flip parts of the sentence. For example: if you want to visualize squeezed, you could pick a cliche stock image of a squished orange, or your could crush the typography of the word "squeezed" in between 2 forces.
  8. Presentation designers pick images that are too powerful, overwhelming, creating a constant barrage of inconsistent visuals with too much going on. Look at a quality piece of print: calmer images, with consistent colors, more white space, more coherent.
  9. We use too much color. Quality graphics design often has muted colors, with a few bright accents. Presentation designers cannot resist the urge to use the full spectrum of colors forcefully on every slide in the presentation
  10. Presenting like Steve Jobs is making your presentation white on black
  11. Images always have the standard rectangular shape, roughly the same as the screen aspect ratio. Why not use very narrow images, round ones? Something different
  12. Presentation designers mostly use text size to emphasize what text is important, and what text is less. Subtle color differences that are so important in print graphics design are not used
  13. Text sizes should always be the maximum possible. Cutting words is great, but why not use the extra space to create more white space on the slide, instead of filling it all up with a bigger text size?
  14. Too much symmetry. Most objects are still centered in the page.
  15. Not used to mixing fonts (partly because of the text/display size twilight zone). Good graphics design uses a few on a page to give interesting contrast. Presentation designers use one (usually).
  16. The limitations of the 4:3 and 16:9 screen, we presentation designers have to do without the vertical dimension that a poster designer can leverage
  17. The one-distance-has-to-fit-all situation. When you look at a poster you can view it from a distance and see the big characters and shapes, intrigued, you can come closer to read the details in the fine print. No such thing in PowerPoint. You sit where you sit, in a fixed distance from the screen.
  18. Presentation designers always hold back and never go to the creative edge a poster designer would go. We have seen too many bar/column/pie charts, bullet point lists, boxes and arrows. It is hard to leave the classical slide compositions behind, and to come up with something daring and new (for 20 slides in the deck).
Continuing my journey into the world of graphics design.

What a great crowd image

Flickr is an unbelievable source of images. I came across this photo by Alex Kess. The texture and colors are amazing (the original on Flickr is much clearer than the image below).

UPDATE: PowerPoint 2011 crashing when entering slideshow mode

OK, more searching solved the issue, which can be found here: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/975723 My toolbar folders were corrupt. Everything is working again without toolbar customization. But when I start modifying the toolbars again (I need a set of 20 buttons or so to be really fast an efficient in PowerPoint), the whole saga starts again. I will keep you posted about my experience with Microsoft PowerPoint 2011.

I have been battling with PowerPoint 2011 for the Mac for the past hour and it seems seriously flawed. When entering slideshow mode, it just crashes. Searching online for a solution reveals dozens of forum discussions about the same issue that are unresolved. Do not upgrade from Office 2008. Repeat, do not buy it, it is not stable yet!

Usually I am an early adopter of software and can live with a few bugs here and there. Not being able to go into slideshow mode kills the purpose of PowerPoint, this is a serious flaw.

Turn Valentine's Day into Generosity Day

Sasha Dichter is the Director of Business Development (fund raising) for Acumen Fund,a global non-profit venture fund that invests in enterprises that fight poverty in the developing world. (Example: investing in a mosquito net manufacturer creates employment/income for a local community and fights malaria at the same time.)

He is building support for a great initiative: turn Valentine's Day into Generosity Day. The idea is that you say "yes" to anyone who asks for help for 24 hours. He himself went through an initiative like this, but kept going for a month, see a video below explaining what he learned form that.



If you are interested in the work that Acumen does, join the community of supporters all around the world. I know that this blog is read by many presentation designers, and doing presentation design work as a gift for a worthy cause is a great way to make a difference. A much better way actually than sending a check (see an earlier post about pro-bono presentation design).

(Disclosure: I help Acumen now and then with their fund raising presentations).

Can I use humor in an investor presentation?

Can I use humor in an investor presentation? (Well, the question applies to all serious presentations). I would be careful. Humor is a great ice breaker when it comes naturally, even in serious presentations such as a pitch to investors. However, making it come naturally is hard to plan. That rehearsal in front of your friends in the living room sofa is a different environment from the corporate conference room.

If you used a joke spontaneously in a previous presentation, you could try to use it again (i.e., program it), in another one if you feel that mood and energy in the room is right. But only then. And never put jokes in writing on slides or in images, you lose the option to pull them out at the last minute. Also, you do not control the digital after-life of the presentation file after the live presentation.

Hey, presentations don't look like this!

Client: "Hey, investor presentations don't look like this! I have seen many before. This one has too many slides, too many images, we need to fix this."

Me: "That's exactly the point"

New French presentation Bible

Recently, I received a review copy of  L'art des présentations Powerpoint, by Bernard Lebelle, a frequent commenter here on the blog. A very interesting book (obviously for those who can read French).

L'art des presentations PowerPoint

My first impressions:
  • Besides the big presentation and speaking insights (often covered in many other books on the subject), this book is a treasure of smaller insights, many of them illustrated with a little diagram or a quick scribble. Almost like reading a constant flow of interesting blog posts. My French is probably not good enough to read this book from page 1 to 386, but the layout with the bite-size illustrated tips and tricks enables me to digest much of the content.
  • It covers a broad range of subjects, all the way from speaking suggestions down to the basics of typography and detailed suggestions on how to use the PowerPoint software
  • Bernard integrates concepts and ideas from many sources (books, web sites) with clear references to them for further reading.
Congratulations Bernard.

Fly through that circle!

The shape combine function in PowerPoint 2010 is great. Here is an example of how you can create text that seems to be flying through a circle. The key is the create 2 half circles and send one of them to the back. In earlier version of PowerPoint, this was very hard to do. (See a review of PowerPoint 2010 here).

Draw 2 circle shapes
Center them horizontally and vertically
Select the shapes, (inner last), shape subtract
Draw a rectangular shape
Same trick: select them both and do shape subtract
Copy and flip the half moon
Send the right half moon to the back and put some text

The sales presentation

Sales presentations have a specific setting. Often, the audience is relatively small. Most of the time you would have time to discuss and prepare the meeting in phone calls before hand. Where as in a VC pitch presentation the audience is probably constantly testing for reasons not to invest in you, someone sitting through a sales presentation would actually really want to buy something from you. Here are some observations (in no particular order) to help you design better sales presentations.

A good sales presentation does not always equal a slide deck Some sales meetings can be conducted without PowerPoint at all. An alternative is a meeting sketched out live on a white board. For example, you could run your client live through a calculation of the financial benefits of your product. It will be clear that although there are no PowerPoint slides involved, these type of presentations might actually require more preparation than regular slide shows.

Talk about the customer issue rather than yourself. Pages and pages about the history of your company, how many employees you have, where your offices are located, are all about your, and not about the issue your customer is struggling with. If you are a startup and you need to establish that you are a financially stable company, do so, but in (most) other cases do not bore your audience with talking about yourself.

Listen, listen, listen. Each customer has specific issues, and customers are very keen to explain them to you. Listen carefully in the phone calls leading up to the meeting. Listen in the meeting. Focus your sales presentation exactly on the customer. Look the audience in the eye and see whether you maintain the attention, there is still eye contact. Rigorously sticking to your script even when the customer signals (questions, interruptions, eye movement) she wants to take the discussion in a different direction is a sure recipe for a turn down.

Sell the problem rather than the solution. Showing that you can articulate/understand the customer's problem is much more effective in sales presentations than spending pages and pages on the benefits of your product. Once you have sold the problem, the customer is likely to buy your solution.

People buy on emotion, justify with facts. Pages of pages with quantified facts are in most cases not the swing factor in a buying decision. Rather, the decision to buy a product or service needs to feel right. I can trust this company, I can work with this person, I can identify with this brand. The real buying decision is emotional. Facts and data are for the justification after the decision is made. As such, your sales presentation should provide both. (Thank you Bert Decker for reminding me of this)

Be careful with attacks on the competition. There is always a temptation to lash out at the competition in your sales presentation. Be careful. First of all I suggest never write these things down in slides. Rather, address these issues verbally during your presentation. Secondly, make sure you got your facts right. If a customer is sitting through presentation of multiple suppliers, they might actually have more knowledge about your competitor's offering than you have. Comments without substantiation are an instant loss of credibility.

Avoid generic statements. People have been reading the same jargon of product benefits all over: cost effective, efficient, scalable, reduces churn, good ROI. If you use this language without a specific context or backup, it is highly likely that they will not register in the mind of your customer. Be specific. Use anecdotes. Present unexpected visuals.

Talk value instead of features. A customer sitting through a sales presentation is interested in the value your product or service brings, not in the list of features. Long feature lists are boring to listen to and not relevant for the purchasing decision. Talk value, and point to a detailed page in the appendix with all those great product features.

Show real images. Stock photography is artificial. Beautiful people and perfect settings working together perfectly. Why not show the real face of your company? A picture of the first shift at 6AM in the morning. A picture of the great people in your customer service department in the middle of the night. Your central London store that just recently opened? These are not images of the logo that is stuck to the front door of your head office. These are images of the real people that make up your organization.

Tell your story once. Repetition is not always good. Some sales presentations tell the story on the summary page at the opening, then repeat the story using the slides in the deck, and then wrap up the same story one more time with the final conclusion page. The introduction page of a sales presentation should be a teaser, promising a specific solution to a specific problem your customer has. The body tells the story. The final summary reminds your customer about the solution.

Presentation outlines should be visual

Everyone knows that it is important to think about the story and flow of your presentation before opening PowerPoint and start designing slides. Paper sketches are great, sticky notes are great. But there is one common approach that usually does not work: writing the story out long-hand in Word.

Long-hand text looks final. When you want to discuss it with a team of people, they start paying attention to wording, fine tuning messages. This is wasted energy at this stage in the process.

But more importantly, text is not visual. "Here we need an image of a man standing in the street holding his phone up in the air in despair". It is much more powerful to discuss the draft or first ideas of a visual presentation with - well - visuals!

As a result I often end up scribbling the first version of a presentation in PowerPoint. But in this case PowerPoint is not the slide design tool, rather a simple note pad to organize ideas.

Spend time on your weakness

A startup pitching to a giant:
  • This will save you millions of cost!
  • Your users are asking for it!
  • We enable you to break into new markets!
  • Your competitors already have something like this!
25 minutes later with 5 minutes left: "convinced?"

"Yeah sure, but we have a policy not to work with startups that might go bankrupt tomorrow..."

It is important to find out the major concern of the giant before pitching. When someone mumbles in a phone call that they have a policy not to work with startups, it is most likely not a side comment. Focus your pitch on this issue. Not explicitly, but in between the lines.
  • Show your blue chip investor base
  • Show the partnerships you have with very established players
  • Show your positive cash flow
  • Show your customer list
  • Show them anything that might support the point
The real battle is here. Maybe it is a hard one to win, but at least you should try.

Sticky Slides becomes Idea Transplant

OK, I have re-branded. One more time the first blog header that I used back in the summer of 2008. (the details: Verdana font, and the standard Microsoft "Trek" color scheme). All the best Sticky Slides...


All links and RSS feeds should continue to work:
http://blog.ideatransplant.com
http://www.stickyslides.com
http://www.stickyslides.blogspot.com
http://feeds.feedburner.com/stickyslides

Can your audience see it's PowerPoint?

If they can, maybe it is time to change the slide design and get rid of:
  • Repeating graphics
  • Titles in the same spot
  • Page numbers
  • "Confidential" on every page

Book review - "Thinking with type"

Regular readers will have noticed that I am reading up on typography lately. Some basic understanding of typography can improve the quality of your presentation designs dramatically. The book Thinking with Type (affiliate link) by Ellen Lupton is one of the most useful ones I read so far. Clear explanations of all the basic concepts with great examples. It comes with great online resources on the Thinking with Type website, covering a lot of material of the book. (See the type crime section, and how I use the wrong quotation marks all the time on this blog).


Earlier reviews of typography books:
  • Just my type, stories about the most important fonts and their designers, useful information, entertaining reading (and great dinner party stories).
  • 20th century type, a more scientific overview of fonts and designers of the past century.
  • 1000 fonts, just what the title says
  • Design elements, a broader review of graphic design concepts
  • Bibliographic, an overview of classic graphic design books